Faculty of Social Sciences , University Of Tehran

Document Type : Research Article / Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Razavi University of Islamic Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

2 MA of Muslim Social Studies, Department of Social Sciences, Razavi University of Islamic sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Human communication is a fundamental element shaping the nature and structure of societies. Civil society and Madinah Fazilah represent two distinct types of societies, each characterized by different forms of communication. Jürgen Habermas and Abu Nasr Muhammad Al-Farabi are prominent thinkers who have examined human communication, its ideal form, and its role in shaping these two societal models. This study employs a comparative-analytical approach grounded in fundamental methodology to examine and compare the levels of human communication in the thought of these two philosophers. The analysis reveals that both thinkers, adopting a critical perspective on their respective societies and the quality of communication within them, propose an ideal society concerned with rationality, mutual understanding, and collective agreement. Habermas’s concept of communicative rationality, along with his emphasis on rational-critical discourse and consensus-building, is central to establishing truth and legal legitimacy, yet it remains fundamentally rooted in conventional reason without transcending its epistemic limits. In contrast, Al-Farabi’s notion of demonstrative communication and mutual understanding extends beyond the human horizon, achieving its full significance through its connection to the First Leader (Rais al-Awwal) of Madinah Fazilah and its metaphysical relationship with the Active Intellect (al-‘Aql al-Fa‘‘āl). This research provides a foundational framework for re-examining and analyzing diverse communicative systems within the two distinct paradigms of Madinah Fazilah and civil society.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abbaspoor, Ebrahim. (2011). A critique of the methodology of Habermas's "communicative action" theory. Ma`rifat-e Farhangi Ejtemai, 2(2), 35-64. [In Persian]
Alberts, Jess K.; Nakayama, Thomas K. & Martin, Judith N. (2019). Human communication in society, Hoboken, NJ : Pearson Education.
Al-Farabi, Abu Nasr. (2002). Ārā' ahl al-madīnah al-fādilah , Tehran: Soroush. [In Persian]
Al-Farabi. (1991). Al-Millah, Beirut: Dar al-Mashriq. [In Persian]
Al-Farabi. (1992). Al-Tanbīh ʿalā sabīl al-saʿādah. Tehran: Hikmat. [In Persian]
Al-Farabi. (2010). Al-Siyāsah al-madaniyyah, Tehran: Soroush. [In Persian]
Al-Farabi. (2015). Al-Ḥurūf , Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press. [In Persian]
Al-Farabi. (2017). Fusūl muntazaʿah, Tehran: Soroush. [In Persian]
Ashraf Nazari, Ali; Attarzadeh, Behzad (2013). Habermas Perspective on Knowledge, Inter-subjectivity and Communicative Action, Political and International Science, 1(1), 33-46. [In Persian]
Azad Armaki, T. (2023). Social thought of Muslim thinkers: From Farabi to Ibn Khaldun. Tehran: Soroush. [In Persian]
Baghdadi, I. P. (1951). Hadiyat al-Arifin. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi. [In Persian]
Barkhordari, A. (2015). a comparative introduction to the nature of utopia in the thought of farabi and nasir al-din tousi. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 45(2), 495-512. [In Persian]
Bashir, Hassan (2008). New Semantics of Communication; Making Possible a Deeper Understanding of Relationship between Culture and Media, Cultural Research, Vol 1(3), 22. [In Persian]
Craib, Ian. (2021). Modern Social Theories: From Parsons to Habermas translated by Abbas Mokhber. Tehran: Agah. [In Persian]
Davari ardakani, Reza (2010), Farabi: Philosopher of Culture, Tehran: Sokhan. [In Persian]
DeVito, J A. (2016), Human communication: the basic course, Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Higher Education.
Donsbach, Wolfgang (2008). The international encyclopedia of communication, New York: Blackwell publishing.
Farhangi, A. A. (2018). Human Communications. Tehran: Rasa Cultural Services. [In Persian]
Goldkuhl, Göran (2000). The Validity of Validity Claims: An Inquiry Into. 112 Communication Rationality, Aache., Germany.
Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests (J. Shapiro, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jurgen (1985), The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jurgen (1993), Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jurgen (2016), The Post- National Constellation and the Future of Democracy, New York: Columbia University Press.
Hassanzadeh, H. (1966). Abu Nasr al-Farabi and his philosophy. Helal Magazine, Summer. [In Persian]
Holub, R. (2004). Jürgen Habermas: Critic in the Public Sphere, Translated by Hossein Bashirieh,  Tehran: Ney. [In Persian]
Hoover, S. (2009). Religion in the Age of Media (Trans. Ali Amadi & colleagues). Qom: Daftar Aql. [In Persian]
Hosseini, M. H. (2010). The manifestation of Imamate in al-Farabi’s Virtuous City. Kosar Ma’aref, 14, 77–104. [In Persian]
Islami Tanha, Asghar (2014). Demonstrative Communication as the Foundation of Culture and the Fazelah Society in Al-Farabi’s Political Science, Journal of Social Cultural Knowledge, 4(4), 5-30. [In Persian]
Islami Tanha, Asghar (2015). Comunication in Iranian excellence community from the perspective of al-farabi, ebne miskawaayh & nasir al addin tosi, Master’s thesis, Baqir al-Olum University, Qom, Iran. [In Persian]
Islami Tanha, Asghar (2015). The production of signs and the exchange of meaning in Al-Farabi’s philosophy of communication, Journal of Islamic Humanities, 2(4), 5-34. [In Persian]
Jaafari, M (20). Society and Rationality in the Thought of Abu Nasr al-Farabi and Jürgen Habermas. [In Persian]
Jafari, M. (2010). Society and rationality in the thought of Abu Nasr al-Farabi and Jürgen Habermas, Master’s thesis, Baqir al-Olum University, Qom, Iran. [In Persian]
Jowkar, G. (2008). Al-Farabi’s social thoughts. Ma’refat Journal, 17(4), 129. [In Persian]
Khan Mohammadi, Karim. (2012). the comparison of communication and revelatory rationalism (on the basis of the views of Habermas and Allamah Tabatabaei). Political Science, 15(57), 31-74. [In Persian]
Khaniki, H. (2004). dialogue, from linguistic connotation to global meaning, Iranian journal of sociology, 5(1), 90-113. [In Persian]
Larijani, M. J. (1996). The Nature of Rationality. Qabasāt Quarterly, 1(1), 116-156. [In Persian]
Madandar Arani, A. (2019). Comparative Research Method in Human Sciences. Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
Mahdizadeh, S. M. (2012). Media Theories: Common Ideas and Critical Perspectives. Tehran: Hamshahri Publishing. [In Persian]
Mohajernia, M. (2001). Political Thought of Al-Farabi. Tehran: Bustan Ketab. [In Persian]
Mohsenian Rad, M. (2020). Communication Studies. Tehran: Soroush. [In Persian]
Mohsenian Rad, M. (2020). Media Studies. Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
Mowlana, Hamid (2011). Communication Studies. Tehran: Ketab Nashr Publishing. [In Persian]
Mowlana, Hamid (2022). On Human Communication. Tehran: Imam Sadiq University Press. [In Persian]
Nekoonam, J. (2011). Research Methods with Emphasis on Islamic Sciences. Qom: Qom University Press. [In Persian]
Noori, Morteza. (2021). A Critique of Foundations of Habermas’ s Theory of Communicative Action. KNOWLEDGE (JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES), 13 (1): 245-265. [In Persian]
Parsania, H (2012). Social worlds, Qom: Ketabe Farda. [In Persian]
Parsania, H (2013). Theory and Culture: Fundamental Methodology of Evolution of Scientific Theories. Strategy for Culture, 6(23), 7-28. [In Persian]
Parsaniya, Hamid, Tale'I Ardakani, Mohammad.(2025) Fundamental Methodology and Applied methodology in Social sciences, with Emphasis on the Approaches of Realism and Nominalism. Ma`rifat-e Farhangi Ejtemai, 4(2), 73-96. [In Persian]
Pusey, Michael (2014). Jurgen Habermas (A. Tadayon, Trans.; 2nd ed.), Tehran: Hermes. [In Persian]
Quante, Michael (2007), Habermas On Compatibilism and Ontological Monism, Philosophical Explorations, 10(1), 59-68.
Rahimi ,Salman Ali (2012). Farabi and Habermas's Methodology, Journal of Social Cultural Knowledge, 2(2), 65. [In Persian]
Salter, L (2005). The Communicative Structures Of Journalism And Public Relations. Journalism, 6(1), 90-106.
Saroukhani, B. (2021). Sociology of communication. Tehran: Ettela'at. [In Persian]
Seidman, S. (2016). Contested knowledge: Social theory today (H. Jalili, Trans.). Tehran: Nashr-e Ney. [In Persian]
Shahriari, P. (2012). Fārābī; The Second Teacher. Roshd-e Borhān, 22(1). [In Persian]
Shiri, Tahmoures, & Azimi, Neda. (2012). A Comparative study of qualitative content analysis and hermeneutics. journal of sociology studies, 4(15), 79-99. [In Persian]
Van den Brink, Bert (1995), die politisch-philosophische Debatte über die demokratische Bürgergesellschaft“ In: Bürgergesellschaft, Recht und Demokratie, von den Brink Bert/van Reijen Willem(Hg.), Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main
White, S. (2001). Recent Writings of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, Justice, and Modernity (Trans. Mohammad Hariri Akbari). Tehran: Ghatreh. [In Persian]
Zaeri, Q & Moalem, S. M. (2016). "Fundamental methodology" from the perspective of fundamental methodology. Journal of Social Theories of Muslim Thinkers, 6(1), 160-129. [In Persian].