Faculty of Social Sciences , University Of Tehran

Document Type : Research Article / Original Article

Authors

1 PhD student in Muslim Social Science, Department of Islamic Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor, Department of Islamic Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

During the 1980s, the scope and limits of state intervention in Iran’s economy became the subject of significant debate between two divergent interpretations of Imam Khomeini’s theory of Velayat-e Faqih (Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist). Prior to the revolution, Shiʿa jurisprudence had largely embraced an individual-centered approach that upheld private property rights and confined governmental involvement to the boundaries of established jurisprudential rules, most notably the principle of taslit (dominion over property). By contrast, Imam Khomeini and several of his followers—most notably Ayatollah Beheshti—advanced a substantially broader interpretation within the framework of “governmental jurisprudence.” This approach attributed extensive authority to the Wali al-Faqih, prioritizing maslahat (public interest) and the preservation of the Islamic system and revolutionary order over strict adherence to traditional jurisprudential norms. Within this framework, the Wali al-Faqih is empowered to restrict or modify otherwise legitimate private property rights in pursuit of higher systemic interests. This theoretical foundation served to legitimize and philosophically underpin expansive state intervention in economic affairs, particularly under extraordinary conditions such as war. Employing a documentary and library-based research methodology, this study draws on jurisprudential sources, historical documents, and jurists’ opinions, utilizing content analysis to examine the impact of the theory of absolute Velayat-e Faqih on economic policymaking. The findings underscore the central role of maslahat in prioritizing public welfare and regime preservation over traditional jurisprudential constraints, thereby facilitating the moderation of previously restrictive legal interpretations. Moreover, tensions between jurists and economic experts regarding the appropriate extent of state involvement in the economy were resolved through recourse to the authority of the Wali al-Faqih and the operative function of maslahat. Overall, the theory of absolute Velayat-e Faqih provided the principal source of legitimacy for expanded state intervention in the economy, particularly during the first half of the decade.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abrahamian, Ervand. (2005). Iran between two revolutions (A. Golmohammadi & M. Ebrahim Fattahi, Trans.; 11th ed.). Tehran, Iran: Nashr-e Ney.
Ashraf, Ahmad, & Banuazizi, Ali. (2007). Social classes, government, and revolution in Iran (S. Tarabi Farsani, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Niloofar.
Azari Qomi, Ahmad. (1984). On the guardianship of the jurist and some economic issues. Pasdar-e Islam, 35.
Behdarvand, Mohammad Mahdi. (2003). Guardianship of the jurist or jurisprudence guardianship: Interaction or conflict? Hokumat-e Eslami, 29.
Beheshti, Seyyed Mohammad. (2018). Economic system in Islam. Tehran, Iran: Rouzaneh.
Beheshti, Seyyed Hossein. (2014). Cooperative economy. Tehran, Iran: Rouzaneh.
Buzri-Nejad, Yadollah. (2021). Methodology of social knowledge of Muslims: Jurisprudential approaches. Tehran, Iran: University of Tehran Press.
Centeno, Miguel A., & Cohen, Joseph N. (2012). The arc of neoliberalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150235
Dezhpasand, Farhad, & Reufi, Hossein. (2008). Iran’s economy during the imposed war. Tehran, Iran: Center for Sacred Defense Documents and Research.
Fallon, Richard H., Jr. (2013). The dynamic constitution: An introduction to American constitutional law and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Hatami, Ali. (2008). State and economy in post-revolutionary Iran: The impact of redistributive policies on hermeneutics, class conflict, and the emergence of a fragmented state. Siasat, 6, 89–118.
Izdehi, Seyyed, & Sediq Taqizadeh, Seyyed. (2020). The nature and characteristics of governmental jurisprudence. Hokumat-e Eslami, 95, 5–26.
Kadivar, Mohsen. (1997). Theories of government in Shiʿi jurisprudence. Tehran, Iran: Nashr-e Ney.
Katouzian, Nasser. (2017). Introductory course in civil law: Property and ownership (48th ed.). Tehran, Iran: Mizan.
Khajeh-Saravi, Gholamreza. (2008). Memoirs of Ayatollah Mahdavi Kani. Tehran, Iran: Center for the Islamic Revolution Documents.
Khalafkhani, Ali, Raghibi, Mohammad Ali, & Alavi Vosoughi, Seyyed Yaser. (2020). Theory of legal edicts and its role in social jurisprudence. Journal of Jurisprudential and Principled Studies, 20, 33–56.
Khomeini, Ruhollah. (2002). Velayat-e faqih: Islamic government (12th ed.). Tehran, Iran: Institute for the Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works.
Mirmazi, Seyyed. (2001). The government in the economy from the perspective of Imam Khomeini. In S. Farahani Fard (Ed.), The role of government in the economy (pp. xx–xx). Tehran, Iran: Institute of Cultural Knowledge and Contemporary Thought.
Mosallinejad, Ali. (2013). Policy-making of power structure in Iran. Tehran, Iran: University of Tehran Press.
Motahari, Morteza. (2018). The fundamental problem in the clergy organization. Tehran, Iran: Sadra.
Namazi, Hassan, & Dadgar, Yadollah. (2011). Conventional economy, orthodox economy, and ethical economy. Tehran, Iran: Sherkat Sahami Enteshar.
Qasemi, Seyyed. (2005). Understanding the social thought of Martyr Ayatollah Mohammad Hosseini Beheshti (Vol. 1). Tehran, Iran: Boqʿeh.
Qazizadeh, Kazem. (1998). The jurisprudential-political thought of Imam Khomeini. Tehran, Iran: Center for Strategic Research of the Presidency.
Hashemi Rafsanjani, Akbar. (2006). Performance and memoirs of the year 1363: Toward destiny. Tehran, Iran: Daftar Nashr Maʿaref Enghelab.
Hashemi Rafsanjani, Akbar. (2010). Performance and memoirs of the year 1366: Defense and politics (5th ed.). Tehran, Iran: Daftar Nashr Maʿaref Enghelab.
Razavi, Kazem. (2018). The crossroads of the clergy: Essays on Shiʿi marjaʿiyyat in contemporary Iran. Isfahan, Iran: Arma.
Salehi, Nasser. (2020). The position and role of absolute guardianship of the jurist in the Islamic economic system: A new model for central bank independence. Crisis Research in the Islamic World, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.2783.4999/QJPR.1909.1094.05
Samiʿi, Mostafa. (2018). Power struggle in Iran: Why and how the clergy won. Tehran, Iran: Nashr-e Ney.
Shariati, Ali. (2005). Class orientation of Islam (5th ed.). Tehran, Iran: Ghalam.
Vijeh, Mohammad Reza, & Amjadian, Hamid. (2015). The approach of the Guardian Council’s jurists toward private ownership and public interest: A procedural study. Journal of Public Law Knowledge, 4(12), 23–46.
Yilmaz, Mehmet L., & Keskin, Hasan A. (2018). Keynes versus Hayek: On the appropriateness of government intervention in markets. Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 10(18), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.14784/marufacd.460686