University Of Tehran Press Social Theories of Muslim Thinkers 2538-5240 9 2 2019 09 23 A Study on Allāmeh Tabātabāī’s Veiws Regarding the Type of Society’s Existence A Study on Allāmeh Tabātabāī’s Veiws Regarding the Type of Society’s Existence 127 146 75027 10.22059/jstmt.2020.285368.1286 FA Mahmood Taghizadeh Davari Allameh Tabataba&amp;#039;i University Journal Article 2019 07 14 Abstract:<br />This article deals with Allāmeh Tabātabāī’s views on the type of society’s existence. I will demonstrate that there is a contradiction and inconsistency in his views regarding this issue. While, explicitly, maintained in his philosophical work, Osool-e Falsafeh va Ravesh-e Reālism, that society has an abstract, conceptual, and non-concrete nature, Tabātabāī insists in his theosophical book, al-Mizān, of concrete, factual and real existence of society. Clearly, these two views are totally different, and incompatible with each other.<br />This article deals with Allāmeh Tabātabāī’s views on the type of society’s existence. I will demonstrate that there is a contradiction and inconsistency in his views regarding this issue. While, explicitly, maintained in his philosophical work, Osool-e Falsafeh va Ravesh-e Reālism, that society has an abstract, conceptual, and non-concrete nature, Tabātabāī insists in his theosophical book, al-Mizān, of concrete, factual and real existence of society. Clearly, these two views are totally different, and incompatible with each other. Abstract:<br />This article deals with Allāmeh Tabātabāī’s views on the type of society’s existence. I will demonstrate that there is a contradiction and inconsistency in his views regarding this issue. While, explicitly, maintained in his philosophical work, Osool-e Falsafeh va Ravesh-e Reālism, that society has an abstract, conceptual, and non-concrete nature, Tabātabāī insists in his theosophical book, al-Mizān, of concrete, factual and real existence of society. Clearly, these two views are totally different, and incompatible with each other.<br />This article deals with Allāmeh Tabātabāī’s views on the type of society’s existence. I will demonstrate that there is a contradiction and inconsistency in his views regarding this issue. While, explicitly, maintained in his philosophical work, Osool-e Falsafeh va Ravesh-e Reālism, that society has an abstract, conceptual, and non-concrete nature, Tabātabāī insists in his theosophical book, al-Mizān, of concrete, factual and real existence of society. Clearly, these two views are totally different, and incompatible with each other. https://jstmt.ut.ac.ir/article_75027_5f9856dec94d80404eb1ac72741ab7c3.pdf