Rereading and interpreting the ideas of leading Muslim thinkers
saeideh Hamledari; Ahmad Fazeli
Abstract
Friendship is an internal quality that stems from the conscience and temperament of a person. Neglecting this essential quality of human existence will result in destructive harm that will be difficult or impossible to compensate. Friendship encompasses numerous dimensions of types, degrees, obstacles, ...
Read More
Friendship is an internal quality that stems from the conscience and temperament of a person. Neglecting this essential quality of human existence will result in destructive harm that will be difficult or impossible to compensate. Friendship encompasses numerous dimensions of types, degrees, obstacles, meanings, and resources, but the focus of this research is on the examination of two essential categories, “friendship’s causes and properties,” and it begins by posing the following questions: What factors motivate man’s tendency toward friendship, and what topics can constitute friendship? The author intends to investigate the answers to the aforementioned questions from the perspectives of Ghazali and Khwaja Nasir al-Din Tusi, two renowned Islamic thinkers. This research required library research to collect the necessary data, which was then compared to determine the similarities and differences between the two approaches. The findings indicate that Ghazali, with his mystic outlook, considers “God” to be the greatest friendship motive among the causes of love. Also, only “God” deserves to be man’s best companion among the subjects of love, and expressing love to other subjects is interpreted as friendship with God. The greatest motivation for love, according to Khwaja Nasir al-Din Tusi, is the combination of the three reasons he lists for friendship: pleasure, benefit, and pure goodness. In terms of friendship, Khajah prioritizes social relationships with other males.
abedin moumeni; jamshid masomi; Mehrdad Jamshidian
Abstract
In the religion of Islam, security and order in society are the basis for the formation and maintenance of a social system.And this can be found in the thought of the elders of religion. The system is used in a variety of concepts such as the organization of social life, the state of affairs, the state, ...
Read More
In the religion of Islam, security and order in society are the basis for the formation and maintenance of a social system.And this can be found in the thought of the elders of religion. The system is used in a variety of concepts such as the organization of social life, the state of affairs, the state, the set of Islamic rules and regulations, and the political, cultural, social, and economic subsystems. And when it is said that disruption of the system is considered to be the system of the Islamic system, the Islamic system and the land, the system of the Islamic government and the system of life and livelihood of the people, and the prohibition of disturbance in this research, what is meant is the prohibition of disturbance in the social system and the livelihood. People. Imam Khomeini is one of the contemporary elders who has discussed and discussed the prohibition of disorder in the system. In their view, it is forbidden to preserve the system according to the wisdom of the imperative and to disrupt it. This descriptive-analytical study with a library study has introduced the principle of non-systemic disorder with an approach to Khomeini's approach as a principle.
Rereading and interpreting the ideas of leading Muslim thinkers
Gholamreza Jamshidiha; Reza Mokhtari; Rahmatollah Mahmoodi
Abstract
Tafkik School is one of viewpoints that's been established to explain the divine-Islamic epistemes and the ways to acquire them. Mirza Mehdi Isfahani and his pupil Sheikh Mahmoud Halaby are the founders. Is this case the question is what is the speculation and rationality means and what is the relation ...
Read More
Tafkik School is one of viewpoints that's been established to explain the divine-Islamic epistemes and the ways to acquire them. Mirza Mehdi Isfahani and his pupil Sheikh Mahmoud Halaby are the founders. Is this case the question is what is the speculation and rationality means and what is the relation between rationality and understanding of Islam. They do believe that rationality is the main concealment to acquire the depth of Islamic thoughts and epistemes.so they stood against every rational approaches. In their thoughts using the argument and being rational is the main thing that make them miss understand. Therefore they are claiming that even all self-evident ideas are darkness and Islamic cognition through this approach is a wrong path and make people go astray. Establishment an argument to achieve the true-Islamic Idea make Islam demolish and it is against the righteousness. In this article we are going to represent the ration and argument place and how to achieve true-Islamic Ideas.
Hossein Kachooyan; Abdolhossein Kalantari
Abstract
The "rule-governed" or "law-governed" nature of the social sphere is a fundamental issue in sociology that has occupied the attention of many classical thinkers, including Weber, Durkheim, and Marx, as well as contemporary theorists such as Habermas, Giddens, and Bhaskar. The positions taken on this ...
Read More
The "rule-governed" or "law-governed" nature of the social sphere is a fundamental issue in sociology that has occupied the attention of many classical thinkers, including Weber, Durkheim, and Marx, as well as contemporary theorists such as Habermas, Giddens, and Bhaskar. The positions taken on this dual subject have significant implications for social thought formulation and, consequently, social change. Accepting either of these options portrays the "what" (ontology) of social phenomena in a particular way. Furthermore, it influences sociological epistemology and methodology, as well as topics such as the degree of human agency and the possibilities for social change. Although this discussion has expanded in the existing social science literature through the reflections of German hermeneuticists and historicists, and more recently through the ideas of the later Wittgenstein, particularly Peter Winch's theories, it can also be traced in Iran through the philosophical reflections of Allameh Mohammad Hossein Tabatabai and compared with the existing literature in this field. This article examines some of Allameh Tabatabai's works on the nature of social phenomena. It also identifies Tabatabai's perspective and reasoning system regarding rule-governance and law-governance in the social sphere within the horizon of new sociological debates. The research method used is library study and intra-textual analysis. Tabatabai considers "social matters" as part of "conventionals" and, on this basis, views the social sphere as rule-governed, directing social sciences towards "reason-seeking." However, he does not reduce all subjects and issues of social sciences and sociology to "rule-seeking." He believes that conventionals are rooted in "realities" on one hand, and thus social sciences can examine the real foundations in the formation of social conventionals through a "causal-seeking" method. On the other hand, these conventionals have real effects through a causal mechanism, which can again be causally examined with the help of social sciences. Based on this, Tabatabai presents a simultaneously rule-governed and law-governed image of social sciences, which has also been formulated in the views of some contemporary thinkers.
