maryam shaban
Abstract
This study entitled "Pioneers Sociology of Childhood in Iran: Motahhari, Shariati, Philosophical" seeks to identify the first ideas about social and cultural analysis of children and childhood in Iran.The method of this research is document analysis. The results show that despite the philosophical ideas ...
Read More
This study entitled "Pioneers Sociology of Childhood in Iran: Motahhari, Shariati, Philosophical" seeks to identify the first ideas about social and cultural analysis of children and childhood in Iran.The method of this research is document analysis. The results show that despite the philosophical ideas of thinkers who have discussed the child and childhood, based on currents and Social and cultural events of Iranian society, especially the challenges of religious scholars with the secularization programs of the Pahlavi government, such as Motahhari, Shariati and Falsafi started a sociological view (based on social and cultural contexts) on children and childhood in Iran. All three thinkers envision an ideal society in their own intellectual space, the most important feature of which is an Islamic religious society centered on Shiism. The necessity of such a society, in their view, is the existence of activists with a Shiite religious character and spirit. Therefore, children, in their view, are potential actors for the ideal society that should be prepared with religious education. For this reason, according to all three thinkers, the most important structure in today's society is the education system; The most important actors in today's society are children; The most important specialists in the current society are scholars and religious specialists and the most important roles in the current society are the role of parents, educators and teachers as the main forces in educating children.
hassan naser khaki; abdolhosein kalantari
Abstract
In Islamic discourses, social changes in the Islamic societies have led into various orientations, meanings, and musts. Drawing upon the discourse analysis methods proposed by Laclau and Mouffe, the aim of this paper is to analyze the semantic systems of Islamic subdiscourses including modernist, fundamentalist, ...
Read More
In Islamic discourses, social changes in the Islamic societies have led into various orientations, meanings, and musts. Drawing upon the discourse analysis methods proposed by Laclau and Mouffe, the aim of this paper is to analyze the semantic systems of Islamic subdiscourses including modernist, fundamentalist, and civilization-oriented ones and indicates the myths and necessities each one put forward for social change in the Islamic world. This analysis is based on the existing documents regarding the political topics which have influenced the formation of the mentioned subdiscourses. While Islamic awakening has been articulated as the source and direction of these changes in the three-fold discourses, they introduce different myths and musts to complete social changes. It is due to the fact that these subdiscources have different semantic systems. The findings suggest that the musts commanded by modernist, fundamentalist and civilization-oriented discourses are the realization of “Islamic modernity”, “a return to the Islamic society” which existed during the righteous predecessors (al-Salaf al-Salih) period, and the formation of a “modern Islamic civilization”, respectively. Since none of these discourses have been able to become the hegemonic discourse in the Islamic world, the outlook of social changes is subject to discursive competitions.
