New ideas for the reconstruction of social sciences based on the sources of Islamic thought
Qasem Zaeri; ali Eskandari Naddaf
Abstract
In the last two decades, there has been a thriving debate on the possibility or nature of "native science" in the general field of humanities in Iran. The status of "social science" in Iran is a part of these discussions, and "sociologists" themselves have been and are part of the localization debate. ...
Read More
In the last two decades, there has been a thriving debate on the possibility or nature of "native science" in the general field of humanities in Iran. The status of "social science" in Iran is a part of these discussions, and "sociologists" themselves have been and are part of the localization debate. This article refers to the opinions and opinions of a group of Iranian social science professors and experts in the aforementioned time frame, to categorize the opinions of the supporters and opponents of indigenous social science in Iran. The article shows that at least three main points can be identified in the discussions of indigenous social science in Iran: the positivist perspective, the continental-postmodern feature, and the perspective of Islamic wisdom. What is common between these three people and their representatives is the emphasis of all three on dealing with science and sociology to the specific issues and topics of each society, and the special attention to its specificity, including the historical specificity and identity of the Iranian society: the first group believes. Fixed and universal theoretical principles and foundations belong to modern science and these principles should be used to understand and solve the local problems of Iranian society. The second group believes that these principles are different for every society and culture, and understanding Iranian society requires identifying the specific cultural and historical principles and rules of this society. The third group definitely has the social beliefs of the first group about the global identity of science, but they consider the theoretical foundation of the modern scientific platform to be wrong and believe that there are alternative foundations to the Islamic wisdom for indigenous knowledge. In this article, the general orientation of "fundamental methodology" is used.In this article, the general orientation of "fundamental methodology" is used.
Presenting an original critical discussion about the nature of the modern humanities and determining its relationship with religion
alireza haddadi
Abstract
The evolution of human knowledge is not only a discussion related to social contexts after the Islamic Revolution, but also in all civilizational interactions between the West and the East and, more importantly, scientific interactions between believers and scientists throughout history. The subject ...
Read More
The evolution of human knowledge is not only a discussion related to social contexts after the Islamic Revolution, but also in all civilizational interactions between the West and the East and, more importantly, scientific interactions between believers and scientists throughout history. The subject of the present article is that different approaches in the sociology of knowledge and philosophy of science have spoken about the possibility of change in knowledge, the link between faith and knowledge, the position of reason and revelation, ways of acquiring and producing knowledge. , Sought to project knowledge committed to non-Western and Islamic presuppositions and always accused of claiming science management from an unscientific and even political point of view. The purpose of this article is to critically re-examine the issues of the evolution of human knowledge, to examine the possibility of such a change in knowledge. The method used in this article is a theoretical approach and qualitative content analysis with a critical approach. The results indicate that the change in human knowledge has different meanings that have been explored in the critical study of the views of believers and critics and the theoretical and practical possibility of this change to the historical and social contexts of science and religion and the performance of the revolutionary movement in Iran Has been criticized.
