Presenting an original critical discussion about the nature of the modern humanities and determining its relationship with religion
alireza haddadi
Abstract
The evolution of human knowledge is not only a discussion related to social contexts after the Islamic Revolution, but also in all civilizational interactions between the West and the East and, more importantly, scientific interactions between believers and scientists throughout history. The subject ...
Read More
The evolution of human knowledge is not only a discussion related to social contexts after the Islamic Revolution, but also in all civilizational interactions between the West and the East and, more importantly, scientific interactions between believers and scientists throughout history. The subject of the present article is that different approaches in the sociology of knowledge and philosophy of science have spoken about the possibility of change in knowledge, the link between faith and knowledge, the position of reason and revelation, ways of acquiring and producing knowledge. , Sought to project knowledge committed to non-Western and Islamic presuppositions and always accused of claiming science management from an unscientific and even political point of view. The purpose of this article is to critically re-examine the issues of the evolution of human knowledge, to examine the possibility of such a change in knowledge. The method used in this article is a theoretical approach and qualitative content analysis with a critical approach. The results indicate that the change in human knowledge has different meanings that have been explored in the critical study of the views of believers and critics and the theoretical and practical possibility of this change to the historical and social contexts of science and religion and the performance of the revolutionary movement in Iran Has been criticized.
Hassan Mohammad mirzaei; Abolfazl zolfaghari; hassan moradi
Abstract
Abstract Abstract Abstract In the field of the possibility, necessity and quality of the production of religious science, different perspectives and opinions have been presented, one of the most important and most important of these views is related to Ayatullah Javadi Amoli, which is reformed as an ...
Read More
Abstract Abstract Abstract In the field of the possibility, necessity and quality of the production of religious science, different perspectives and opinions have been presented, one of the most important and most important of these views is related to Ayatullah Javadi Amoli, which is reformed as an ijtihadi approach It is remembered. Considering the scientific status and the importance of his theory among various approaches to the production of religious science, this paper seeks a thorough and comprehensive examination of his approach. Therefore, using the discourse analysis method of Laclau Mouffe, the discursive elements of his approach are identified and presented in a semantic-communicative system. Based on discourse analysis, the element of "religious comprehension" and its maximum look at it, as the superior sign, are at the center of its theory, and other elements identified as sliders in connection with this sign are defined. And with articulation, they have been linked with each other.
nouroallah nourani; hamid parsaniya
Abstract
After the Renaissance and the growth of empirical sciences in Europe, fundamental divisions emerged between the empirical sciences (empirical methods) and the church claims, which resulted in the European community voting for a conflict between science and religion. Given the dissemination of empirical ...
Read More
After the Renaissance and the growth of empirical sciences in Europe, fundamental divisions emerged between the empirical sciences (empirical methods) and the church claims, which resulted in the European community voting for a conflict between science and religion. Given the dissemination of empirical sciences and their achievements in Islamic societies, this challenge has deepened and has involved thinkers and experts of this field. Shahid Morteza Motahari and Abdolkarim Soroush, as two prominent epistemologists in Iran, adopted contradictory positions regarding the conceptual aspects of religious science, which affected the subsequent intellectual currents. This study, based on three main questions, has comparatively analyzed the positions of these two thinkers on the nature of science, the method of science and possibility/impossibility of founding a religious science. As a result, since Soroush believes empirical science has an autonomous domain compared to other types of knowledge and its empirical method is based on the falsification logic, there is no possibility of establishing a religious science. On the contrary, according to Shahid Motahari, empirical science, as one type of knowledge, has a longitudinal relationship with other forms of knowledge. In his view, the method of science is empirical, and using logic of analogy and, if used in this way, and satisfies the individual and social needs of the Islamic society, and if, ultimately, targeted by Islam, can be considered as religious science and has religious authority.
Rereading and interpreting the ideas of leading Muslim thinkers
nazila akghlaghi; mahdi hoseinzadeh yazdi
Abstract
Abstract The discrimination between the meanings of science and religion, and the determination of the precise relationship between these two domains are the prerequisites of rectifying the meaning and the essence of religious science in the eyes of theologist Mesbah. Expressing the status of the science ...
Read More
Abstract The discrimination between the meanings of science and religion, and the determination of the precise relationship between these two domains are the prerequisites of rectifying the meaning and the essence of religious science in the eyes of theologist Mesbah. Expressing the status of the science in the system of scientific religion, and the right contemplating of the impacts of religion, and the fundamentals of oxiology of science will open new horizons in yielding scientific theories, the validation of the mentioned ideas twoard the researchers. Precisely explaining the meaning of science and concerning the different realms of science have settled the scope of current expectations and capabilities in forming the scientific ideas, therefore leading to a correct judgment about the science.According to the ideas of theologist Mesbah, what has affected the formation of scientific theories, which is mentioned here as religion and fundamentals of oxiology, is greatly significant. Furthermore, determining the impacting scope of each one is worth paying attention.Consequently, available statements about this subject and the existing flaws are discussed within this essay. Theologist Mesbah has placed value on the affection of religions and fundamentals of oxiology in the description part of human science, as in the advisory part.
